“In the recent past, the practice of infringing barcodes as trademarks has conspicuously surfaced. Further, the problem of counterfeiting is getting more serious, particularly in the essential goods market in view of the ongoing pandemic,” said Sonal Madan, a partner at Chadha & Chadha in New Delhi.
In May 2020, the Court passed an interim order and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) blocked the websites including its alternative websites.
On January 12, 2021, Global Barcodes did not appear in Court. The Court then issued an order of injunction against Global Barcodes, a decree of damages to be paid by Global Barcodes to GS1 India in the sum of Rs. 20 lakhs and an order for the ISPs to block or take down impugned domain names and alternative websites. Another decree was issued to restrain the other defendants from providing services to Global Barcodes.
“Barcodes play an integral role in battling counterfeits across the globe,” said Madan. “The case deals with enforcement of barcodes as certification trademarks. Precedents of this nature provide effective protection to consumers, retailers, brand owners and other stakeholders in the supply chain. Further, they also perforate accountability in the system by generating mechanisms for identification and insulation of infringing elements at every stage of the logistics network.”
“Therefore, the decision of the Honorable High Court in recognizing the underlying intellectual property rights over the ‘890’ certification trademark shall create effective deterrence amongst the infringers of these machine-readable code certifications,” Madan explained.
A single 2D datamatrix barcode by GS1 not only holds a significant amount of information; it remains legible, allowing machines to read it even if it’s in small-sized print and regardless of the product on which it is printed. 2D barcodes are used in healthcare, manufacturing, warehousing, logistics and other industries.
Espie Angelica A. de Leon