Jagadeesan further explained that modern technology has paved the way for better means of copying material, thus defeating the protections ascribed to an author’s work. Not only are digital copies far superior; they can also be more easily and extensively disseminated, to any part of the world for that matter, with just a few clicks.
“It is bad enough that copyright protection was very negligent as an activity among the academicians due to various reasons,” said Jagadeesan. “To add insult to injury, the new technological changes make mincemeat of any protectionist clauses, as it is ubiquitous and impossible to trace the infringers many a time.”
According to her, academicians in India to date have not capitalized on the Copyright Act for their works as an aspect of wealth creation.
However, Jagadeesan emphasized there is another side to the debate, namely that information found in the digital era is not the monopoly of one. Rather, it should be shared with all.
“It is the duty of the legislature to balance the right of the general public to access digitized materials and e- resources and the economic interest of the authors. This dichotomy therefore needs to be addressed and any move to change the current laws, should be to enhance the access and usage of electronic information,” she said.
One amendment she would like to see in India’s Copyright Act would be one that will balance the doctrine of “fair use” or “fair dealing.”
She explained: “Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957 provides for exemptions to copyright infringement, which inter alia include a reproduction of copyrighted work for educational purposes. However, the laws need to be revisited to also understand the limitless reproduction of works that can take place due to technology and account for some exceptions being carved out to enable monetary capitalization of the publications, by educational institutions. The provisions of Section 52 would require to be revisited so as to look at exemptions that can be provided for online learning programs as well as sharing of material. This might reduce piracy.”
Jagadeesan added there should also be an amendment to address the transborder nature of infringement and have adjunct regulations or policies to address the same.
“According to scholars William M. Landes and Richard. A Posner, ‘the economic efficiency of copyright is maintained when the benefits to create additional content outweigh the cost of restricting access.’ This only goes on to support the requirement that innovation should never be suppressed,” she claimed, “and this balance is what the amendments should keep in mind if the law is to keep abreast with the changing times.”
Espie Angelica A. de Leon