The Curious Case of Negative Matching

We recommend to enable your javascript upon using this website to see full functionality.
Please click the link on how to enable it: https://www.enable-javascript.com/

Please wait while the page is loading...

The Curious Case of Negative Matching

07 September 2015

Recent decisions in English courts make it seem possible to infringe a competitor’s trademark even when you’re not using it. Lucy Nunn describes the curious case of negative matching.

To continue reading this article, please Login or Register to be a subscriber

Tags: FieldFisher Interflora v Marks and Spencer CJEU Google France

Law firms

Moo Deng trademark in Thailand granted to the first 38 entities, with more anticipated soon

29 October 2024

China’s IP Experts 2024

30 October 2024

Myanmar issues first trademark registration certificates under new trademark law

10 December 2024

IPOS rejects Google opposition to registration of “confusingly similar” mark in Singapore

23 February 2024

The Curious Case of Negative Matching

Law firms

Related Articles

Moo Deng trademark in Thailand granted to the first 38 entities, with more anticipated soon

China’s IP Experts 2024

Myanmar issues first trademark registration certificates under new trademark law

IPOS rejects Google opposition to registration of “confusingly similar” mark in Singapore