Gurry Calls on Copyright to “Evolve”
19 September 2012
World International Property Organization (WIPO) director general Francis Gurry said this month that copyright needs to evolve to current technological realities or risk becoming irrelevant. Speaking at a conference hosting by Australia’s Faculty of Law of the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) on the future of copyright, Gurry said there is no “single magical answer” to the development of a successful policy response to the challenges facing copyright in the digital age, but a combination of “law, infrastructure, cultural change, institutional collaboration and better business models.”
Gurry said the central question facing the evolution of copyright policy is how to maintain a balance between availability of cultural works at affordable prices while assuring a dignified economic existence for creators and performers. Digital technology is having a radical impact on those balances. “Rather than resist it, we need to accept the inevitability of technological change and to seek an intelligent engagement with it,” he said. “There is, in any case, no other choice – either the copyright system adapts to the natural advantage that has evolved or it will perish.”
The Director General said there are three main principles that should guide the development of a successful policy response. The first is “neutrality to technology and to the business models developed in response to technology.” He said the purpose of copyright is not to influence technological possibilities for creative expression or the business models built on those technological possibilities, nor to preserve business models established under obsolete technologies.
“Its purpose is to work with any and all technologies for the production and distribution of cultural works and to extract some value from the cultural exchanges made possible by those technologies to return to creators and performers and the business associates engaged by them to facilitate the cultural exchanges through the use of the technologies. Copyright should be about promoting cultural dynamism, not preserving or promoting vested business interests,” Gurry said.
A second principle, he said is “comprehensiveness and coherence in the policy response.” Gurry recognized the limitation of law to provide a comprehensive answer and said that “infrastructure is as important a part of the solution as law.” In this respect, he said collective management societies “need to re-shape and to evolve“ as their present infrastructure is outdated as “it represents a world of separate territories and a world where right-holders expressed themselves in different media, not the multi jurisdictional world of the internet or the convergence of expression in digital technology.”
“We need a global infrastructure that permits simple, global licensing, one that makes the task of licensing cultural works legally on the internet as easy as it is to obtain such works there illegally,” he said.
In this respect, Gurry said “an international music registry – a global repertoire database – would be a very valuable and needed step in the direction of establishing the infrastructure for global licensing. And, secondly, in order to be successful, future global infrastructure must work with the existing collecting societies and not seek to replace them.”
The culture of the internet also needs to be taken into consideration. Referring to the high rates of illegal downloading, Gurry said that “in order to effect a change in attitude, I believe that we need to re-formulate the question that most people see or hear about copyright and the internet. People do not respond to being called pirates. They would respond, I believe, to a challenge to sharing responsibility for cultural policy. We need to speak less in terms of piracy and more in terms of the threat to the financial viability of culture in the 21st century, because it is this which is at risk if we do not have an effective, properly balanced copyright policy.”
The third guiding principle for a successful response to the digital challenge is the need more simplicity in copyright. Gurry called copyright “complicated and complex [and] reflecting the successive waves of technological development in the media of creative expression from printing through to digital technology, and the business responses to those different media.” He warned that “we risk losing our audience and public support if we cannot make understanding of the system more accessible.”
Core Technology Patent Granted in Canada
CardioGenics Holdings has been notified by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office that its patent application for the “core technology” utilized in its ultra-sensitive point-of-care immuno-analyzer, the QL Care Analyzer, has been granted. Patents covering core technology have now been issued in at least three jurisdictions, with a patent application for core technology currently pending before the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO).
“We are very pleased that the patent offices of Canada, the European Union and Japan have acknowledged the unique nature of the core technology upon which our QL Care Analyzer is based,” said Yahia Gawad, MD, chief executive officer of CardioGenics Holdings. “The granting of these patents in these major commercial markets further enhances the value of CardioGenics’ intellectual property portfolio.”
