The Curious Case of Negative Matching

We recommend to enable your javascript upon using this website to see full functionality.
Please click the link on how to enable it: https://www.enable-javascript.com/

Please wait while the page is loading...

The Curious Case of Negative Matching

07 September 2015

Recent decisions in English courts make it seem possible to infringe a competitor’s trademark even when you’re not using it. Lucy Nunn describes the curious case of negative matching.

To continue reading this article, please Login or Register to be a subscriber

Tags: FieldFisher Interflora v Marks and Spencer CJEU Google France

Law firms

Copyright violations make up bulk of complaints by Indian users received by Google in July 2022

06 October 2022

Google’s use of trademarks as keywords makes it liable for infringement – Delhi HC

31 August 2023

How do the Olympic Organizing Committee and gold medalists protect international trademarks?

30 August 2024

Protecting consumer interests in trademark examinations

29 October 2024

The Curious Case of Negative Matching

Law firms

Related Articles

Copyright violations make up bulk of complaints by Indian users received by Google in July 2022

Google’s use of trademarks as keywords makes it liable for infringement – Delhi HC

How do the Olympic Organizing Committee and gold medalists protect international trademarks?

Protecting consumer interests in trademark examinations